1Set the terms of a break while nobody is angry: what you will say, how long you will take, where you will go, and that you will not drive. Then it is a shared arrangement rather than something you do to the other person.
Leaving can be used as a weapon. Two days of silence, walking out while someone is crying, driving off into the night: all of that can wear the clothes of a coping skill. The check is simple enough to ask out loud, which is whether the other person feels safer or more frightened when you go.
Islamic evidence
Consult with them about matters, then, when you have decided on a course of action, put your trust in God (Quran 3:159). Consulting first is what makes a plan shared rather than imposed.
“By an act of mercy from God, you [Prophet] were gentle in your dealings with them- had you been harsh, or hard-hearted, they would have dispersed and left you- so pardon them and ask forgiveness for them. Consult with them about matters, then, when you have…”
Qur'an 3:159
Psychological evidence
The research on anger and emotion regulation, including a large meta-analysis, is about what happens inside the person doing the regulating: brooding and bottling up track with more anger, reframing and acceptance with less. It says nothing about whether any particular break is safe for the person left in the room, and that is a separate question this kind of evidence cannot answer. Judge it on their account of it, not on how well regulated you felt.
Pop GV, Nechita DM, Miu AC, Szentágotai-Tătar A. (2025). Scientific reports · doi
Review detail
Why it works. An arrangement the two of you made in advance cannot be repurposed mid argument as a way of getting the upper hand.
When not to. If there is fear or control in the relationship, or either of you has been hurt, this needs a professional who screens for that rather than a skill practised at home.