1Harm that comes out of feeling threatened and harm that is done coldly, to get something, are not one problem wearing two faces. Before deciding what would help, work out which one you are looking at.
The first kind runs hot. A person feels cornered, the body goes off, and the damage is done inside a few seconds. The second is quiet and aimed, with very little feeling in it at all. Everything built for fear and arousal, slowing down, catching the early signs, is made for the first and does almost nothing for the second. Offering it to the wrong one can waste months and leave people less safe than when you started.
Islamic evidence
There is cause to act against those who oppress people and transgress in the land against all justice (Quran 42:42). Deliberate domination is named as its own wrong, kept separate from a person losing hold of themselves.
“but there is cause to act against those who oppress people and transgress in the land against all justice- they will have an agonizing torment”
Qur'an 42:42
Psychological evidence
A comparison study of 113 men convicted of domestic violence found that impulsive and premeditated perpetrators differed across a range of measures, which suggests a single intervention model will not fit both. It was a cross-sectional comparison, so it maps the difference rather than telling you what to do about it. Even so, it is reason enough to ask which pattern is in front of you before choosing an approach.
Stanford MS, Houston RJ, Baldridge RM. (2008). Behavioral sciences & the law · doi
Review detail
Why it works. A remedy only works if it is pointed at whatever is actually driving the behaviour.
When not to. If anyone is currently in danger, safety comes first and the question of motive can wait.
Feedback
none yet2When someone introduces themselves as an abuser, take the word seriously without treating it as the finding. A label names a category of offence, not what is actually going on in them.
Some people arrive with the language of a programme or a court already fitted to them, and it closes down the question of what drives the behaviour before anyone has asked it. Others use the word to punish themselves. Either way, accepting the frame whole means treating the name rather than the mechanism, and you get agreement without change. Ask instead what happens in the few minutes beforehand, and what the behaviour seems to be protecting.
Islamic evidence
Those who remember God and implore forgiveness for their sins if they do something shameful or wrong themselves, and who never knowingly persist in doing wrong (Quran 3:135). The line drawn here is about what a person does and keeps doing, not about the name they carry.
“those who remember God and implore forgiveness for their sins if they do something shameful or wrong themselves- who forgives sins but God?- and who never knowingly persist in doing wrong”
Qur'an 3:135
Psychological evidence
A meta-analysis of batterer intervention programmes with non-treated comparison groups found effects on domestic violence recidivism that were small and inconsistent across outcome sources. Those are programmes organised around an offence category rather than around any particular mechanism. The finding does not say nothing works, only that grouping people by the label has not delivered much so far.
Cheng SY, Davis M, Jonson-Reid M, Yaeger L. (2021). Trauma, violence & abuse · doi
Review detail
Why it works. You can only change something you have described accurately.
Feedback
none yet3Some of what a person does to a partner is not defence and not temper. It is a script they watched at home, absorbed as ordinary, and never once held up to the light.
The tell is that it does not feel like a decision. There was no rush of heat and no sense of crossing a line, because at some level this is simply how things go between people. A pattern like that responds to being named and questioned rather than to fear work, and the naming is often most of it: this was the house you grew up in, and it is not the only way a house can be run. Expect grief when it lands, since seeing it clearly usually means seeing what was done to you as well.
Islamic evidence
Live with them in accordance with what is fair and kind (Quran 4:19). The standard set here does not depend on what anyone happened to see modelled at home.
“You who believe, it is not lawful for you to inherit women against their will, nor should you treat your wives harshly, hoping to take back some of the bride-gift you gave them, unless they are guilty of something clearly outrageous. Live with them in…”
Qur'an 4:19
Psychological evidence
In a randomised prevention trial with 272 Head Start families, combined parent and teacher training reduced conduct problems and promoted social competence in four year olds. Change the adults around a child and what the child takes in changes with them, which is this same mechanism running forwards instead of back. It was early prevention with young children, so it does not directly test undoing a script in a grown adult.
Carolyn Webster‐Stratton; M. Jamila Reid; Mary A. Hammond (2001). Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology · doi
Review detail
Why it works. Something learned as normal stays in place until somebody points at it and calls it what it is.
Feedback
none yet4Ask whether the anger is really about this person at all, or whether it is contempt for a whole category of people that happens to have someone standing nearby.
It sounds different once you listen for it. The complaints come out in the plural, about how women are or what wives do, and the particular person in the story keeps vanishing from her own story. Treating that as a relationship difficulty misses it completely, because there is no conflict between two people waiting to be resolved. What has to be met is the belief itself, which is slower work and needs somebody willing to say it out loud.
Islamic evidence
God commands justice, doing good, and generosity towards relatives and He forbids what is shameful, blameworthy, and oppressive (Quran 16:90). Domination itself sits among the forbidden things, not only the temper that carries it out.
“God commands justice, doing good, and generosity towards relatives and He forbids what is shameful, blameworthy, and oppressive. He teaches you, so that you may take heed”
Qur'an 16:90
Psychological evidence
In a cluster randomised trial across 64 Ethiopian villages, a gender transformative participatory intervention delivered to men, women and couples reduced intimate partner violence. That is evidence that working at the level of what people believe about men and women can change what happens at home. It was one trial in one setting, and how far it travels is an open question.
Sharma V, Leight J, Verani F, Tewolde S, Deyessa N. (2020). PLoS medicine · doi
Review detail
Why it works. If the driver is a view about a whole group of people, nothing that repairs one relationship will touch it.
Feedback
none yet5If the harm has only ever happened when someone had been drinking, the drinking is not the background to an anger problem. It is the anger problem.
Families often know this long before anyone says it aloud: he is fine, except. Go through it honestly, every incident, drunk or sober, and if sobriety has never once produced violence then everything else waits. Years can go into breathing and calming work for a person whose behaviour was never really about how well they calm down.
Islamic evidence
Do not kill each other, for God is merciful to you (Quran 4:29). The people most at risk here are usually the people in the same house, which is why dealing with the drink is itself an act of care towards them.
“You who believe, do not wrongfully consume each other’s wealth but trade by mutual consent. Do not kill each other, for God is merciful to you”
Qur'an 4:29
Psychological evidence
In a randomised clinical trial, adding a brief motivational alcohol intervention to a batterer programme reduced substance use and violence, and people with alcohol problems had benefited least from the standard programme. A separate experiment that gave alcohol to intimate partners found it shifted the balance of positive and negative behaviour during a conflict task, so the effect on how a disagreement goes is fairly immediate. Neither says drinking explains all violence, only that where it is in the picture it belongs in the plan.
Stuart GL, Shorey RC, Moore TM, Ramsey SE, Kahler CW, O'Farrell TJ, Strong DR, Temple JR, Monti PM. (2013). Addiction (Abingdon, England) · doi
Testa M, Crane CA, Quigley BM, Levitt A, Leonard KE. (2014). Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · doi
Review detail
Why it works. Treating what actually sets the harm off works faster than treating what merely turns up alongside it.
When not to. If someone becomes dangerous when drunk, the first question is how everyone stays safe tonight, not what treatment to arrange next month.
Feedback
none yet6Some true things cannot be said early. A reframe that would land well in the tenth conversation will end the second one.
Ideas about what really drives harm, or about a person being more than the worst thing they have done, are easily heard as excusing it or as blaming the listener. What makes them sayable is the credit built up beforehand: enough time of being useful and straight that the other person can assume you are not setting a trap. Waiting is not cowardice. It is what stops a good point being spent for nothing.
Islamic evidence
Tell My servants to say what is best. Satan sows discord among them (Quran 17:53). Saying the best thing includes when to say it, since a right word at the wrong moment does the work of a wrong one.
“[Prophet], tell My servants to say what is best. Satan sows discord among them: Satan is a sworn enemy of man”
Qur'an 17:53
Psychological evidence
An updated Campbell systematic review of court mandated interventions for domestic violence found the evidence for reduced reoffending is weak, which is sobering given how widely these are used. Attendance plainly is not the same thing as being persuaded. The review cannot tell you that the alliance is the missing ingredient, but it does argue against assuming someone is with you simply because they are in the room.
Wilson DB, Feder L, Olaghere A. (2021). Campbell systematic reviews · doi
Review detail
Why it works. People can take a hard idea from someone they already trust, and from almost nobody else.