Courses › A parent who keeps hurting you
Your marriage
A parent who keeps hurting you
What the religion actually asks of you, what it does not, and how to hold a limit without cutting the tie.
Read this first. Some of what gets called a difficult parent is not difficult, it is dangerous, and this course is the wrong one for it. If you are frightened of a parent or a relative, if you have been threatened, if someone is holding your passport or your documents, if you are being pressured into a marriage or threatened over travel or marriage, if someone controls your money so that you cannot leave, if a child in the family is being harmed, or if you are having thoughts of not wanting to be alive, then stop here. Go to the course called When home is not safe, and reach a service today. Forced marriage and honour based harm need a service that handles exactly that, not a general counselling line. Nothing here is scored, and nobody is being told what is happening to them.
What this course teaches
Boundaries, and the difference between the two kinds of control
It separates behavioural control, which is rules and supervision and is ordinary parenting, from psychological control, which is intrusion into your inner world through guilt, love withdrawal and conditional regard. Then it works on what you will and will not do, rather than on changing them.
Why this one
The distinction between the two kinds of control is well established and psychological control is the one that tracks harm. What follows about boundaries is a clinical judgement about what helps an adult child, and it is not a claim from a trial.
What this course will not do
Any ruling on what you owe a parent. This course holds that birr does not require obedience to harm, which is a position the lessons set out, and it does not issue a verdict on your situation. If you are being harmed now, that goes to a service.
Six short lessons for an adult child of a parent who is still hurting them. It names the patterns, explains why the same conversation keeps happening and why explaining yourself better has never once worked, and it separates two things that are usually taught as one, which are kindness to parents and obedience to parents. The endpoint here is not cutting anyone off. It is a tie that is kept and an amount of harm that is reduced. Where a ruling is needed, the course says so and sends you to a scholar rather than pretending to be one.
Who this is for
An adult child who dreads the phone ringing. Anyone who leaves a visit feeling smaller than when they arrived and cannot explain why to anybody. Anyone who has been told that having a limit with a parent is a sin. It assumes no clinical background and no training in the sacred sciences.
What this is not
This is not therapy for a childhood. It does not go back through what happened to you, does not ask you to write it out or tell it, and does not ask you to write a letter to your parent, delivered or not. It plans no confrontation and no showdown. It gives no advice on reporting anything, because that is a legal matter with consequences a course cannot see. It gives no fatwa. It cannot tell you what your own situation requires of you, and it will not try.
The lessons
6- Where you left off. When it is not just a difficult parentThe patterns, by name, and what this course is actually aiming at.7 min
- Why you cannot argue your way out of itThe same conversation, six times a year, and the step in it that is doing the damage.7 min
- What birr al-walidayn actually requiresWhat the verses command, what they do not, and the reports that get quoted at you.7 min
- The boundary that is not a ruptureKeeping the tie and limiting the access are two different things, and only one of them is being reduced.7 min
- What feeds itSiblings, the aunts, the community, and the engine that runs on all of them.6 min
- When a course is not enoughPlain markers, what help looks like, and the cases where distance is a safety matter.6 min
What this course is built on
- Qur'an 2:286, 4:36, 4:135, 4:148, 6:164, 17:23 to 24, 29:8, 31:15, 46:15. Translation throughout: M.A.S. Abdel Haleem, The Qur'an, Oxford University Press, 2004. 58:22 is not quoted and not argued in this course. It is used in opposite directions in popular material and it is not touched without a written scholarly position. The clause in 17:24 about being brought up is named as a live question in the commentaries and is not interpreted here.
- No classical work is named for the definition of uquq. See the note. An earlier version of lesson 3 rested its definition of uquq on Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani's Fath al-Bari, named by work only, with volume and page unverified. Fath al-Bari is not among the works this platform holds, so that attribution could not be checked against any text, and a course does not print a scholar's name beside a wording nobody here has read. The corpus was then searched properly for a definition with edges and does not carry one. So lesson 3 no longer rests on that definition. It says openly that the definition is usually referred to the commentaries, that we could not check that reference, and that a reader should be suspicious of any page giving a scholar's name and a wording without a volume and a page. The answer to the point before it is rebuilt on Qur'an 31:15 and 29:8, which separate refusal from kindness inside one sentence in the gravest case there is. The per school statement on the limits of obedience to parents is still not asserted anywhere in this course.
- The prohibition of qati'at al rahm, and the discussion of whether reduced contact falls under it. Blocked pending a written scholarly position. The course states the prohibition, states that scholars have discussed the distinction and have not all landed in one place, asserts no ruling, and routes the learner to a scholar who knows their situation.
- Barber BK (1996). Parental psychological control: revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67(6), 3296 to 3319. Identifier unverified, so none is published. Cited for the construct only.
- Sahih al-Bukhari 2654, 5971, 5991, 7257; Sahih Muslim 2558; Sunan Abi Dawud 5138; Sunan an-Nasa'i 3104; Jami' at-Tirmidhi 1899, 1900. Only reports graded sound or good are used, and each carries its grading and grader on its own entry. Tirmidhi 1899 is presented with the printed note that the stronger chain makes it a statement of the Companion rather than a direct attribution. The narration of Sa'd and his mother is described in lesson 3 as background and is deliberately not cited, because its reference carries a sub letter that has not been confirmed here and the number without the sub letter is a different report. The saying that your parents are your paradise and your hell is named as an unsourced saying and is not used.
- Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA, Sethi D, Butchart A, Mikton C, Jones L, Dunne MP (2017). The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Public Health, 2(8), e356 to e366. Population level risk, published with the authors' own statement of high heterogeneity on the same screen. No individual prediction is drawn from it and no score is produced. The original Felitti and Anda 1998 study that began this literature is referred to in general terms only, because its identifier was not confirmed.