That is lesson 3 done.
What the verses command, what they do not, and the reports that get quoted at you.
Anything you wrote in this lesson is in your notebook, on this device only.
Where this lesson comes from
- No classical work is named for the definition of uquq. See the note. An earlier version of lesson 3 rested its definition of uquq on Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani's Fath al-Bari, named by work only, with volume and page unverified. Fath al-Bari is not among the works this platform holds, so that attribution could not be checked against any text, and a course does not print a scholar's name beside a wording nobody here has read. The corpus was then searched properly for a definition with edges and does not carry one. So lesson 3 no longer rests on that definition. It says openly that the definition is usually referred to the commentaries, that we could not check that reference, and that a reader should be suspicious of any page giving a scholar's name and a wording without a volume and a page. The answer to the point before it is rebuilt on Qur'an 31:15 and 29:8, which separate refusal from kindness inside one sentence in the gravest case there is. The per school statement on the limits of obedience to parents is still not asserted anywhere in this course.